Monday, August 24, 2015

What to Conclude from the XT Fork Proposition

The XT "debate" on bitcoin forums is becoming deafening. On other forums, I have tried to argue a monetary perspective as opposed to a technical one.

Unfortunately, most of the protagonists in the various strands of argument seem to be unaware of what economic objective cryptocurrencies have (creating money). They have all re-invented an objective according to their own particular agenda, and most of those objectives are technical, not economic.

For example:

 • the cryptonote people think hiding the blockchain is the most important priority

 • the monopolist lobby think that consolidation of a one-world crypto is the priority

 • the hardcore miners think that observance of published supply profile is the priority

 • the XT/20Mb block people think that large blocks are the priority

 • the security maniacs think that small blocks are the priority

What do you notice about all these priorities ? - they are all in conflict with one another.

Hiding the blockchain to support privacy is in conflict with keeping the blockchain public to support transparency. Diversifying bitcoin's appeal using sidechains is in conflict with the requirement of optimising monetary fungibility. Increasing blocksize to facilitate network capacity is in conflict with a myriad of things including security, efficiency and client accessibility.

Why are all these priorities in conflict and why is cryptocurrency encountering these problems ?

Because they all have to be reconciled within a logically mono-tiered network. The network functions according to the principles of unity (multiple units of cloned logic that don't help each other in any way other than providing redundancy) as opposed to harmony (multiple units of diverse logic that are complimentary in function).

In the 1950's and 60's, computing science determined unambiguously that functional diversity amongst network peers was far more powerful than "unity" (redundant, mono-tiered logic) and client-server computing was born. This then found its way onto desktops in the eighties in the form of client-server database computing and client-server web computing. 

The problem with that paradigm for decentralised cryptocurrencies is that a 'server' (as in web server or database server) represented a single point of failure and also conflicted with the objective of creating a 'trustless' monetary media.

What Dash has done is migrate the old client-server physical model to a logical one so that the server element can be reproduced redundantly just as the client can, thereby creating a decentralised network exhibiting a logical diversity that no other cryptocurrency has.

I don’t think most people realise the huge significance of this. By definition, there is no server and no client anymore so the network is simply flat and diverse. Despite that, it is still able to operate in an articulated mode with 2 tiers of complimentary logic.

As far as doing an investment appraisal of this characteristic, 2 questions spring to mind:

 • what are the technical implications of a cryptocurrency network with logical diversity over one with no logical diversity?

 • what are the monetary implications of a cryptocurrency network with logical diversity over one with no logical diversity?

These are the 2 questions I've asked myself over the last year, however, never did I get more relevant answers than during the current XT vs Core debate in the Bitcoin forums:

The technical implications are that a logically diversified network can independently optimise technical properties that would otherwise be in conflict with each other. *

The monetary implications are that the electronic monetary token known as 'Dash' can exist as a totally fungible unit which is not dependent (nor derives any of its value from) financial superstructures. **

Cryptocurrencies have arrived at another transition phase right now because the predicted 2015 revaluation hasn’t happened. Bitcoin may well continue to be the “crypto reserve” but it isn’t capable of diversified protocol logic and Dash is. It doesn’t support native coin mixing and Dash does. Its technical priorities are now dictated by the personal egos of 5 developers while Dash’s will be determined by its holders to whom developers will be accountable.

Native coin mixing in a public context is a basic premise of what defines ‘cash’, not just digital cash - any cash. Dash adds all these subtle monetary enhancements without compromising the one thing that made bitcoin work without a trusted counterparty - the public blockchain.

I keep investigating other cryptos and I keep concluding that while they are all creating very interesting solutions, they are not creating money. Bitcoin is (in a confused way) and Dash is (in an organised way).

------------------------------------------------

* - Capacity can be addressed without recourse to blocksize. Confirmation time can be addressed without recourse to blocktime. Governance can be addressed without recourse to developer politics.

** - PORTABILITY and FUNGIBILITY are monetary properties which the Dash network is optimising far and away more than any other electronic monetary token. For PORTABILITY read [bitcoin-protocol compliance and InstantX]. For FUNGIBILITY read [Darksend] which supports anonymity in a public blockchain. Something that no other cryptocurrency does anywhere near to the same extent.

Written by Toknormal
Source: Bitcointalk.org

Sunday, August 23, 2015

ICO vs Decentralized Budget system

I think the introduction of projects like Ethereum, Blockstream and many crypto start ups with VC funding makes clear that in order to develop a project long term you need funding.  I think an adaptive system like Dash's decentralized budget system, where funding is voted by an assembly of people on an ongoing basis, without the existence of a central budget under the control of a central authority is far superior than the ICO model for a crypto start-up. 

From experience, investing too much too soon is a very common mistake when building a new project/company. At the beginning you know less about your own business and it takes time to build a vision that you are ready to follow for several years.  That means you normally have to try a few different things before you find your way and are at risk of investing too much on those first 3 years of operation and then having funding issues later on.  

On the other hand,  having no funds at all is a far worse situation to be in as it does not allow you to hire the services of companies and individuals a project needs to reach its development goals and to communicate to the public about the solution.  So is clear that either an ICO or Dash's system is far superior than no funds or relying solely on altruism. 

The advantage I see in Dash's approach is that getting funds on a as needed basis and through a public approval process prevents unnecessary spending, is more transparent and most importantly it allows the project to invest organically and adapt to a changing market environment.  So as the priorities of the market shift you are able to invest in different directions. For example, the market right now is very interested in scalability solutions, Evan is already working on a very cool model for Dash that will be presented when he is ready.  Other important hidden needs may come up in the future that are not visible right now but with an adaptive funding system we will be ready to approach those when they come up.

I think during the fist few years an adaptive decentralized funding system, like Dash's, is superior to getting a large amount of money up-front.  After you reach critical mass and a project has found its niche and is more stable; having a larger centralized budget could be better. But having controls and voted spending at the beginning will give a community driven project like Dash a far greater chance of success. It is not the only factor, you also need true talent and innovation, a hard working community, good timing to market  and good karma, but a sustainable funding model is definitely a very important factor and quite challenging to implement.  So I think after September 5th a whole new paradigm begins for Dash.

By Minotaur26
Source: Bitcointalk.org 

Wednesday, August 12, 2015

Evan Duffield from DASH on Decentralized Governance & the Bitcoin block size debate


Introduction
On this episode I’ve got an extended interview with Evan Duffield, the inventor of Darkcoin and now the lead developer of DASH, which is the same thing, just rebranded if you missed that.
In it we talk about the block size debate, what really sets the DASH project apart and what the future of crypto currency could look like.

CCN
So I’m on the line with Even Duffield, Hi Even it’s a great pleasure to have you today.


Evan
Hi, it’s great to be here.

CCN
As listeners are probably aware you are the progenitor of Darkcoin, which later became DASH and is one of the leading contenders of the crypto currency scene and I’m kind of interested to know what you did prior to launching Darkcoin.

Evan
Well prior to launching Darkcoin I worked as a software engineer pretty much my whole adult life. I started programming when I was 15 and it’s always been a passion of mine. More recently I’ve been working with companies doing social marketing. I was writing the back end for large web crawlers and basically built the same engine that google uses to rank websites and we were using that to rank fortune 500 and fortune 100 clients. I was using lots of machine learning techniques to have an edge.
I got interested in crypto in mid 2010, started following along and I realised there was an issue with privacy and that’s what lead to the creation of Darkcoin originally.

CCN
Ok, and so Darkcoin, which wasn’t meant to be an nefarious label as far as I’m aware had an existential crises in which you guys said we can’t be Darkcoin anymore and we need a rebrand. I was watching the market at the time and it seemed that the market agreed with you. You didn’t see a mass exodus or a serious tanking of the price. So congratulations on that but how would you say the regular DASH development is going now?

Evan
It’s doing great! We did successfully rebrand the currency, which was a relief. You know Darkcoin was not actually intended to be a nefarious coin. With the name Darkcoin I was originally thinking that the block chain is hidden and that’s all it meant to me but to the Average person it apparently meant crime, which was unfortunate and we had to do something about it and we acted quickly and things are now working out really well with that and so we’re moving on.
The next thing we’ve been really working on behind the scenes is what we’re called the v12 release, which includes the decentralised budgeting and it includes the removal of the reference node which has been a huge issue for DASH and Darkcoin since the very beginning so we’re really excited about both of those projects.

CCN
OK, so tell me about why the reference node needs to go away.

Evan
DASH includes a variety of features which are not included in the Bitcoin project and one of those is anonymity and the anonymity comes from things called masternodes. These masternodes can be run by anyone of the network and they basically run a full node and you can connect to any one of these and you can make transactions that obfuscate the block chain and in return for providing this service and for providing other services to the network like syncing clients and things like that the masternodes are paid part of the block chain reward. To do this originally because it’s really difficult to do it a decentralised way we had one node that co-ordinated who got paid next and that node was called the reference node. We’ve figured out a way to remove that node and still have the same quality of payments.



CCN
I imagine that was a point of contention amongst people to say the reference node could maybe be compromised of something, probably came up a lot.

Evan
Yeah, In the spirit of crypto you don’t want anything centralised and the goal was always to remove it eventually. It was really a temporary solution and we are now at the point where we’re able to remove it, which is great.

CCN
The reason we’re here to talk today is because you have a decentralised governance. Basically a new voting system that enables the masternodes and like you said anyone can become a masternode to vote on important changes in the development process and I guess we may as well not hide it, what we’re talking about here is [a solution to] what bitcoin is facing where it seems like the whole community is paralysed over this question of “can we raise the block limit” and there seems to be equal arguments for and against. DASH now has a simple mechanism to get around that

Evan
There are two aspects to the decentralised governance proposal and one of them is what you alluded to in that masternodes get a yes/no vote on any proposal, so you could create a proposal that DASH should increase the block reward or you could create a proposal to increase the block size… anything really, and you can gage the support of the community in a way that you can’t tamper with and is pretty final.
By utilising this logic we’ve also included what we’re calling the decentralised budgeting. What we’re really trying to solve is the funding mechanism of crypto and there’s been only a couple of ways that it’s been done to this point. One of them is to create a foundation (not for profit). These have been underfunded and in my opinion they’ve done pretty poorly at doing their job.
The masternodes can vote on a proposal and you can think of this as a decentralised Kickstarter and the masternodes are kind of like senators. So there are proposals that come before them and they vote yes or no. These votes are tallied and the proposals with the most support (the most yes votes) will get paid first and the budget will be filled out [with proposals] from the most support to the least support, until it runs out of money and then all of these proposals will be paid directly from the block chain.

CCN
Say I don’t own a masternode but I have a great idea, can I take it to someone with a masternode and they can propose it or can I propose it without a masternode?

Evan
So the whole system is completely decentralised which means it is all done from within the protocol itself so if you have access to a masternode you submit the proposal and the proposal appears on the network and then anyone with a masternode can vote for it [or against it]. We’re going to make available a piece of software [or website] and it’s going to look like a decentralised kickstarter where anyone without a masternode can make an account and submit a proposal. The community can then give feedback and you can see how many votes you have and you can make changes to the proposal based on the feedback until you get enough votes to have it funded.

CCN
You’ve said before that you intend to challenge Bitcoin directly and is this one of the ways you’re doing it by removing the need to have yourself or any directorate and creating a system where the people interested in DASH are able to suggest ideas for the future and the people with the most holdings have to ability to advance DASH?

Evan
The way I see is Bitcoin basically has a monopoly on crypto currently and I don’t think that their strategy of the way they want to run Bitcoin is the only legitimate way to run a crypto and we need more ideas in crypto and I think we need a healthy market of ideas, so I wanted to make DASH and show that there are other ways to do things that work and that work really really well. One of those ways is to leverage the block chain technology and to use this like a decentralised kickstarter and to fund all of these things within the ecosystem to support itself and it’s better than taking grant money to pay developers or getting the money through the foundation and paying developers or anything like that.

CCN
I would say the one thing that the Bitcoin foundation has succeeded at is a centralised place for people to be angry at it. I means in a regulatory sense its been useless, you know it didn’t do anything to stop the bit-licence.

Evan
One of the biggest issues with crypto is that people have a huge incentive to get involved in projects when they’re really young because the crypto itself is very cheap and if you put in some effort you’ll make returns on your investment really easily as we’ve seen with bitcoin and a lot of these other cryptos. The generation after that, the second and third and fourth generation, those peoples only incentive to get aboard is to buy low so they can sell at a higher price but they’re not benefitting themselves by supporting it long term.

CCN
So how is DASH preventing this problem, are you suggesting DASH is going to solve this problem?

Evan
The fact that if you get involved in any crypto, even Bitcoin, currently there’s no financial incentive, like if I was working on the Bitcoin project fulltime, I wouldn’t get paid until I was supported by either grant money or by the foundation, which is almost non-existent right now.
The way that DASH intends to solve this is with the budgeting system. Anyone can get involved at any time within the projects lifecycle and earn money, so if you have an idea for advertising and you had some skill for advertising you can make a proposal, put it towards the community and if they vote yes, suddenly you’re getting paid for the work you’re doing. So it allows anyone to get involved for a lifetime and allows the second and third and fourth and fifth generations to contribute and get something back for their effort.

CNN
There’s a huge debate going on in the bitcoin community which has now got beyond technical now, now it’s really ideological it seems. As somebody with a deep interest in crypto and as a programmer, what do you think is going on and what do you think should happen.

Evan
I see it from both sides and I think the issue is that there’s some merit to both of their arguments. On the one hand if you increase the block size the full nodes suffer because they’re not being incentivised like they are in DASH and that means the people running the full nodes will have to pay for the extra bandwidth and also syncing will take a lot more time and there are other issues of a technical nature. If you don’t increase it and they implement lightening then suddenly you can do most of the transactions off of the chain and you can just commit that as needed later on, which is also another solution and I think I would prefer that solution because it keeps the full nodes happy and it keeps the block chain smaller.

CCN
In the DASH protocol the Masternodes (Full nodes) actually receive part of the mining rewards, is that right?

Evan
Yeah, so in the DASH project if we wanted to increase the block size, the full nodes would actually be compensated for the traffic so we wouldn’t actually lose the full nodes like the Bitcoin project would.

CNN
Suppose somebody was coming to DASH, what would be your biggest advice to them as far as getting involved at this time?

Evan
Anyone can get involved, you just head over to dashtalk.org and check us out or head to the main website dashpay.io and you can help with developing or any of the initiatives, We have about 50 volunteers working on the project at any given time so the more the merrier.

CCN
So what’s next for DASH? You guys continually impress many of us with instant transactions [instantX] and now you have a system that subverts the need for any central authority and a self-funding system… I mean what do you do when you’ve conquered the world 

Evan
The next goal would be to use the budgeting system to advertise and show the world what we have created to try and make that a real competitor to the Bitcoin project and give this space some competition.
The last thing I that want to see is the Bitcoin developers to make some tragic mistake and the whole of crypto is not trusted for the next fifteen years. But if there are two projects at least and one of them is ok and the other one fails then we’re not going to have that situation.

CCN
Thank you and have a great day

Evan
Thank you, Thanks for having me


https://soundcloud.com/cryptocoinsnews/ccn-podcast-10-week-26evan-duffield-from-dash-on-decentralized-governance-the-bitcoin-block-size-debate

Source: Cryptocoinnews.com

Dash Proposes Decentralized, Anonymous and Sustainable Funding Structure

Dash Proposes Decentralized, Anonymous and Sustainable Funding Structure
The traditional incentive and funding systems for cryptocurrencies are broken. Right now, they only serve well the early adopters, so we get new coins launched all the time because it doesn't make economical sense to work for established ones. Of course, money is not the only incentive, but it is quite a big one, and it is absolutely necessary to compete with the established system.
Developing a new cryptocurrency not only requires skills and workforce, but it also requires plenty of other resources that are expensive, including servers, tools, bandwidth, communication, among many others.
In the past we've had, broadly, three models to fund projects:
1. Donation based: This model relies on people donating, directly or via platforms, to the development of the coin. It may work while the early adopters are still around, as there is a clear incentive to donate: they will profit hugely from their big stash if the coin gets big. However, this model cracks the minute that the distribution improves and wealth is less concentrated. The average coin holder is not so eager to donate and let the free rider benefit.
It also has problems to attract top talent because it is really difficult to get enough funds for that. Because of this, most devs are also early adopters or investors.
2. Prefunded: This one relies on people putting money towards development, before the project starts. It usually takes the form of some kind of pre-sale. This system has many problems and bad reputation because it has been repeatedly abused. It encourages hyping and over promising.
Also, it is impossible to know accurately what the needs will be before even launching. Finally, it is not sustainable because there is no solution for the time the funds are spent.
3. Privately backed: We have recently seen a rise in privately backed entities that have more resources than the other projects. In the near future, it is likely that this model will become more common as big companies want to enter into the space.
The first two models are usually centralized, but that can be graduated with distributed decision systems or structures. The third one is fully centralized and that makes it more vulnerable to regulation, as well as third party pressures.
The more centralized the model, the more dependent the developers are on specific people or entities to fund the project, and the less prone they will be to make radical decisions and to really innovate. Their freedom to code is at risk without new models.

Dash Network

Dash has come up with another model that is sustainable, decentralized and may let them compete with the well-funded projects. To explain this, let's first make a quick detour into the architecture of the Dash network.
Most coins only reward the miners for the maintenance of the ledger, leaving nothing for the full nodes that also do important tasks for the network. Dash, in contrast, shares the block reward between the miners and the Masternodes, which is its take on the classical full nodes.
Along with being incentivizing the network is healthy with around 2,400 Masternodes at the time being and it can ask these nodes to do even more things for the coin. In Dash's case, nodes take care of the anonymization of coins and of transaction validation for instant confirmations.
While miners might be reluctant to share their reward, they can also feel like being part of a wider system in which they valuably contribute. In this sense, Masternodes are what make Dash different and innovative.
There is also a second specificity that makes this system noteworthy. The nodes need to prove they control a certain amount of coins (1,000 DASH). Nodes can spend them at any time, but if they do, the Masternode will stop working. Thanks to this feature, no rogue party can try to subvert the network by starting a huge number of nodes to damage Dash: the cost would be too high.

Dash Funding Proposal

Dash wants to use part of the block reward to fund development initiatives and give control of those funds to the Masternode network as a group.
They already have a voting system in the protocol that Masternodes can use to manage everything. Those funds will be sent to an escrow account. Then anyone can submit development/promotion proposals with a budget to fund them, and the Masternodes will vote.
Approved proposals will be funded directly from the blockchain with those reserved funds. If there is an excess of funds, they will not get spent until there are projects approved.
Those proposals can be anything: paying a developer a monthly salary, hiring a company to work on a specific integration ... someone could even propose to keep funds in a savings account with certain conditions. All proposals will be submitted to a website and the community at large will be able to discuss them. If the promoter of a proposal doesn't deliver on his promises after it is approved, the Masternodes can change their vote and he would stop receiving funds.
The system is sustainable because there are new funds in each block. It is also decentralized because nobody can really control it and anyone can take part if they buy coins. Finally, it is as transparent as it gets. Everything is public and happens in the blockchain
This idea takes the blockchain to a new level: decentralized anonymous voting build into the network to sustain the network.
Dash has published this proposal to the Dash community to get feedback. You can follow the discussion at Dashtalk.org.
Disclaimer: The author, Fernando Gutierrez, is the Vice-Chairman of the Dash Foundation. 
Source: Cointelegraph.com

EVAN DUFFIELD OF DASH (DARKCOIN): DASH WILL POSITION ITSELF AS A DIRECT COMPETITOR TO BITCOIN

Since early in 2013, Darkcoin has been a permanent fixture in the daily digital currency news. From Darkcoin's initial meteoric rise, quickly reaching a USD value of $15, to the level of security and innovation it provides for privacy seekers, to the failures and triumphs of the "Masternode Network", Darkoin has been almost as interesting and intriguing as Bitcoin itself. And 2015 is shaping up to be a year of rebirth for Darkcoin, which is now Dash. We discuss the state of Dash, and the digital currency industry, with core developer Evan Duffield here on CCN.

Interview with core developer Evan Duffield

You recently made some sweeping brand changes, going from Darkcoin to Dash. Can you tell us about your strategy behind that? Is Dashcoin the correct term, or just Dash?
Dash
The goal of this project has always been to try and create a technology as similar to digital cash as possible. We decided to change the name to Dash because we believe it better represents our new vision, to create a medium of exchange that is both private and instant for the masses. Dashcoin is a separate project though; we’d prefer to be known simply as Dash.
For readers who might be somewhat new to digital currency, what separates Dash from Bitcoin, if you can briefly go over two or three key differences.
Dash is built on the same technology that made Bitcoin successful. In addition, it employs a secondary network known as the Masternode Network. Master Nodes are a new concept in digital currency, where users are incentivized to run full nodes and provide extra services to the network such as Darksend and InstantX. Put simply, they allow us to add features to Dash that are impossible in Bitcoin.
Over the last year, there has been quite a serious issue with exchange risk in the digital currency industry. Either exchanges are getting hacked and losing currency or closing altogether with user's funds inside. What would you do to stop this scourge from turning people off to digital currency, considering the potential investment unsafe? What do you suggest for the digital currency industry as a whole when it comes to managing exchange risk? Insurance? Oversight? Regulation?
It's a shame that many new users get burned this way, but I don’t believe that regulation or insurance is the answer. There're a few different routes to fixing this issue; first we have plans to add 2-factor authentication to the reference client. With this implemented, even exchanges could use the 2-factor authentication on their cold/hot wallets, limiting their exposure to theft.
Having heard you speak on Bitcoin before, you seem very sure you have a better currency than Bitcoin itself and seem dedicated to competing more directly with Bitcoin. Is that your goal? To knock Bitcoin off of the mountain top, per se?
Eventually, I believe Dash will position itself as a direct competitor to Bitcoin. In the meantime, Bitcoin enjoys a monopoly more or less on the space, which is unhealthy. For example, if the only crypto-currency in use is Bitcoin and it has an issue, the entire crypto-economy would be affected, burning the vast majority of it’s users. However, if there are 5 or 10 crypto-currencies in common use, it will reduce the systemic risk on the sector as a whole and make it safer for everyone.
What metrics do you use to judge the success of your work? What do you monitor daily or weekly to monitor your progress in the market? Is US Dollar value important to you and your currency?
I try to avoid looking at the price too often, I think it's mostly noise unless you're looking at longer term charts that look very healthy. The statistics that I find the most informative are website traffic statistics, including which countries are interested in Dash (China and Russia are the biggest sources currently). Also the amount of core team members that are active on a day-to-day basis.
What is one feature that Dash maintains that would surprise people? Some trick that Dash can do that even seasoned digital investors may not know about?
dash
There's a really interesting way to pay people using the Masternode system and donation feature. Say you want to settle a 20DASH debt, youcan configure your node, which receives payments periodically for the services it does for the network, to tell the network to pay that personinstead of yourself. The money is effectively being created by the blockchain and sent directly to them, instead of you. 

Any new features you're looking to add in 2015 that you can reveal to our audience. What can we look forward to in the short-term from Dash?
Can we do another article about this? I have something, it’s giant and could be a standalone article if you're interested. It could solve the lack offunds for development in a completely decentralized way, while involving the main stakeholders in the decisions. 
Teaser received. Any advice for new digital currency investors, besides investing in Dash? What do you tell people about getting into digital currency when you first meet someone new to the concept? What do you tell your friends and family when they ask about getting started?
Crypto-currency is still new and dangerous. It is still "The Wild West" right now, and you've got to be very careful about who you trust. Don't invest more than you can afford to lose. And do lots of research. Also, don't store coins in exchanges.
Evander Smart: That's what Andreas told me last week. Do not use exchanges as wallets. Do your trade and remove your funds expeditiously. Hopefully, people are heeding the advice of industry experts.
Final question: Five years from now, where will Dash be in 2020?
By 2020, we should have a completely working Masternode system and 100% decentralization. Also mobile wallets for sending and receiving money instantly, in a secure way, without having to wait for block chain confirmation. With all of this technology implemented, the goal is to get many small businesses to take Dash directly through mobile devices. This allows customers to buy something in person and walk out 10 seconds later after InstantX confirms the transaction is valid and locks it.
One thing he said really resonated with me is that Bitcoin does need some competition within the marketplace. Monopolies are always bad for the consumer, and Dash has many innovations that can only make digital currency better going forward. Bitcoin can improve, and that's what competition does. It makes you step up your game and improve. If all of digital currency's eggs are in Bitcoin's basket, that is not a great long-term strategy.
We at CCN cannot give investment advice, so do your own due diligence, but I haven't seen a better altcoin on the market than Dash. If you want increased privacy and innovative technology that really provides value in an altcoin, Dash is where I'd start looking. I believe Litecoin's days as the silver to Bitcoin's Gold are numbered. From what I've seen, Dash is just a better currency. And isn't that what we really wanted all along?
To me, it is simply the best altcoin on the market. In a world where privacy and freedom are becoming four-letter words, this is the right currency at the right time. I believe there will come a day when everybody needs a little Dash.
Images provided by Dash and Medium.com
What is your favorite altcoin on the market today? Is Dash a good competitor for Bitcoin? Does Bitcoin need competition? Share above and comment below.

Source: Cryptocoinnews.com

DASH Solves Bitcoin’s Lack Of Privacy Problem

Written By: Fernando Gutierrez
Bitcoin is not anonymous 
People often get this wrong. They believe that because they don’t provide their name in the wallet, nobody knows who they are. However, what that achieves is, at maximum, pseudonymity. It is true that there is no central registry of names and addresses, but everything else is public and there are multiple ways in which names and addresses can be associated. Once that association is done, the fully transparent Bitcoin blockchain does the rest in order to have a complete picture of that user’s transactions.

One of the most obvious ways to reveal who is behind an address are hacked exchanges. Most users verify their identity there. They then have their data and addresses leaked when the exchange get hacked. Note that I say when, not if, because history proves that centralized services with valuable information inside, do get hacked eventually. This could also happen with merchants or even private individuals with whom any user interacts. The truth is, whenever we give a Bitcoin address to someone who knows who we are, we are opening the door to our finances.
Bitcoin’s transparency is one of it greatest features, but there are many reasons why in some occasions that transparency is not desirable. Those who say that if you are not doing something illegal why do you care about privacy are wrong. Privacy is essential for human development because it gives us freedom to experiment. Also, it is essential for security reasons. It can also avoid giving governments and companies too much information they can analyze without our knowledge and use it to their advantage.
Another great feature of Bitcoin, its permanence, is also a privacy problem. That is so because the association between a user and the addresses can happen in the future. Then the party who is analyzing can go back into the blockchain an get information about transactions done many years ago.
Current Bitcoin anonymization methods don’t work 
For all these reasons people have been trying to use Bitcoin anonymously since its inception. The most common method is mixing the funds with other people, so nobody really knows for sure the origin of a transaction. The problem with this method is that it is usually tedious and the user needs to trust in the third party that coordinates the mixing. There are numerous occasions in which the coordinator of such services has disappeared with the funds, so it is clearly not a good solution. Also, transactions can be traced through the ‘dead change’ method.
Enter Dash 
Dash has developed a system to give privacy back to its users. Other alternative cryptocurrencies do this by destroying the transparency of the coin’s blockchain or using less tested cryptographic methods than those used by Bitcoin. Dash has managed to do it without any of those trade offs. The blockchain is fully transparent and the software is very similar to Bitcoin because its code is derived from Bitcoin’s code.
Dash mixes the user’s funds ahead of time and keeps a separated balance of those funds, which makes it more convenient than other methods. The security is also taken into account because the funds never leave the user’s wallet, so there is no risk of somebody stealing the funds that are to be mixed.
The process in detail 
The first thing that the wallet does when a user wants to mix funds is to split them into common denominations (0.1, 1 or 10 DASH). This way the mixing is easier because all the sizes are standardized. Then, a coordinator of the mixing is randomly selected by the network among the available masternodes, which are a special type of node with some extra features. The masternodes creates a complex transaction with at least three users’ transactions in which they send themselves those standardized amounts. No third party can know what inputs and outputs of that transaction belong to who, as can be seen in this example.
To increase the security this process happens several consecutive times, with a new masternode selected randomly for each stage. Thanks to this, users can be confident that no third party can trace their funds because nobody can control a big part of the network of masternodes. The reason for this is that in order to start a masternode the operator needs to put 1000 DASH as collateral and set it aside. The operator always keeps the funds, but if he uses them, the masternode stops working. With that requisite it is impossible to control the network of masternodes. The malignant party that would want to do it would need to buy most of the coin supply.
At the time of this writing there are approximately 2800 masternodes in the network. This means that someone with 1000 masternodes, which is a crazy high number that probably nobody will ever have, only has 1 possibility in 4000 to trace a transaction that has gone through eight rounds of mixing. If he only had 100 masternodes, which is still really high and would cost almost half a million dollars, would only have 1 possibility in 500 billion.
The user can start this process by simply pressing a button in the wallet. After that he only needs to wait for the mixing to happen. Once the funds are mixed, he can use them anytime as he would with other funds.

DASH: XhE2ctUNhsCbCrTe1nQATnq4gqzihfZhc1
BTC: 1BtAepQzdjRtNCu2i98UnNyissehvynVxc

The information provided herein is the author’s opinion and provided for entertainment purposes only. While the author strives to make the information on this website as timely and accurate as possible, the author makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this site, and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in the contents of this site. The information contained in or provided from or through this website is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice, investment advice, trading advice or any other licensed advice. The authors on this website are in no way liable for any decisions you make based on information provided herein. CryptoWorldwide.com and its staff do not necessarily endorse nor oppose any claims made by authors on the website. All content is subject to copyright and may not be reproduced in any form without express written consent of the publisher.

Source: Cryptoworldwide.com

Evolution of money: Cryptocurrency


Nowadays, many people feel that in our world (and in the world of money) something is going wrong..., but they can't understand what it is, what the cause is and where we are moving? Let us try to clear up the situation, glimpsing at human, money, and cryptocurrency history.






Evolution of people and money



Money had appeared in the dawn of mankind as the medium for exchange, money changed along with people, serving increasing demands of growing communities. Groups combined into tribes, then settlements, later into cities, and after into states. While growing, the communities became stronger and competitive, and the interactions within them, including economic, began to acquire ever larger scale, variety, and significance.



In any new stage of development of civilization, money evolved as well – it became more functional, changing for increasing requirements and completing additional tasks ever more effectively. Money became the main tool in such important processes as trade, savings, lending, investment, taxation, regulation, etc. Currencies issued by states also became the key mechanism of control and management within the country as well as at the international level.



To understand the present situation, it is important to realize that for millions of years the human evolution occurred in conditions of the cruel struggle for limited resources, in which won the most successful individuals and communities taking out resources from nature and competitors. Wars did not cease. Obeying primitive instincts to defend interests of their groups, people traditionally inflicted damage on competitive communities, at the same time the majority sacrificed its personal interests for survival of a group as a whole.



In the recent decades, the technology level of mankind has multiply increased, but people themselves are not able to change so rapidly. Religions and states manage to adjust at some extent the inherited "wild" behavior of the population, which allows to build greater, more constructive and effective communities. But unfortunately, to speak of considerable success in this area is still premature. The rapid shift of outer attributes (spears were cast, ties were put on, etc.) doesn't block, but only covers deep-seated instincts which served as a basis of survival throughout millennia.



As a result, we have a picture of egregious inefficiency in the global scale when self-contradictions ever more impede (don't contribute) the further development. At the same time, a significant part of overall potential is spent not on creation, but on destructive struggle of people and groups traditionally striving to win in the evolutionary race at the expense of neighbours. In the old times, such behavior helped people to survive and progress in the environment of small rival societies, today it prevents us from combining efforts in the format of a single global community.



Is it possible to eradicate this primitive instinct of destruction (in globalization - self-destruction conditions) and turn to the next level of development? It is necessary to tackle this problem as soon as possible in order not to die in fire of even more destructive means of resistance. New common security systems in all the key areas (including the world of finance) are to be developed with the use of modern tools emerging as a result of technological progress. The results of introduction of the Internet and decentralized technologies of effective interaction based on the Internet demonstrate vast potential of this direction...



It is impossible to forecast the future, but it is evident, as always, money must change after any other changes occured. Obsolescent payment systems always lost their role and new ones capable to resolve all the spectrum of urgent problems replaced them. Already now it is hard not to notice an explicit mismatch of the current financial system with direction and dynamics of overall development. If in such areas as public health, struggle against crime, arms control, etc., the nations manage to jointly develop new decentralized common security mechanisms, its users are not admitted to participation in change of the existing financial system.



Why is it like that? Let us go back in history. In the twentieth century, the world of money underwent more significant changes than in the whole previous period. For centuries, silver and gold carried out role of the recognized cash equivalent, but the physical limitations of its vast use made service of expanding economy more difficult. Besides, the authorities were always interested in replacing of hard controllable gold money with various paper substitutes. An unlimited issuance of "paper currency" and the opportunity for bullion market manipulation allowed to deprive gold of its monetary functions in favour of so called fiat money, only declaratory «secured».



Permissiveness which became a result of concentration of power of issuers of the key fiat currencies spawned a number of negative processes – play with an interest rate, credit gambles, manipulation of the stock market, currency wars, real wars, etc., having subordinated world finances (and the economy with policy through them as well) to the interests of the "new elite". Nowadays the world financial system significantly transformed into the global system of deprivation of resources of planet neighbours under which many "vassal states" become poorer and lose their independence. It all does not leave hopes that financial elite acting in its own interests is interested in improvements and is able to resolve problems created by it.



Actually, like clients of the only bank, all the world is offered to remain passive users and hope for conscience of those in whose hands power is concentrated. Such a hierarchy imbalance can't last perpetually and will lead sooner than later to the migration of users to alternative decentralized tools of financial interaction capable to fairly serve the interests of the majority of participants of the system. And, the longer this problem will remain unresolved, the more painful an inevitable transition to a new monetary system of the next generation capable to resolve all accumulated problems will become. But when and how precisely this will happen is not known.



But there is good news – technology, program, and cryptography innovations of the recent years allowed the enthusiasts to develop their own models of payment systems. The programmers combined efforts to create cryptocurrencies - alternative non-national currencies with their own monetary unit, their issue, infrastructure, etc. Cryptocurrencies even in the «baby- stage» managed to prove their viability in practice – throughout the world, thousands of people and organizations already use these technologies – and market capitalization steadily holds the mark of several billion US$ dollars. Cryptocurrencies become, along with the Internet, a part of an overall trend of release and a union of people in the framework of the sole community.



An appearance of cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin.


In 2008, the first cryptocurrency Bitcoin began to develop. The proposed concept of the decentralized payment network differs so much from old solutions that its advancement and its potential fulfillment will still take some time. The other innovations such as electricity, cars, planes, the mobile communication, the Internet, etc. adapted in a similar way for mass use. Freedom of movement, communication, etc., recently seemed to be science fiction, today became reality, having directly or indirectly improved everybody's life. The main value of cryptocurrencies is that they ensure one more degree of freedom – freedom of personal finance. The wide circulation of this technology will lead to a vista of significant changes in many spheres.



Omitting technical details, Bitcoin can be described as the electronic payment system using its own currency with a limited issue (pattern of decreasing extraction as gold) and operating through a secure decentralized network. The Bitcoin network automatically certifies transactions, at the same time security and reliability are provided with the use of cryptography and up-to-date information technology. Before Bitcoin appeared, the operation of all payment systems had based on power of the central trusted body (bank, payment service, etc.) establishing accounts of the customers and certifying all their operations. Thus, in the banking system the transactions are executed when they are confirmed, secured, and executed by banks. At the same time, the users are in with a complete dependence on banks themselves, as well as on all superior organizations. Money in a banking system can be tracked, blocked, excepted, diluted by inflation, etc.



It is a different situation with Bitcoin. Bitcoin technology allowed to refuse from certification of transactions by intermediaries – all translations are checked in a decentralized way and are certified by the Bitcoin network itself which functions in a distributed manner, as in torrent networks. The Bitcoin system does not belong to anyone, its users are equal and the program source code is open and publicly accessible, it guarantees an independence, justice, and safety. To open an account and to start to use Bitcoin, users should not open their identity and obtain someone's permit. It's enough just to connect to the Internet and to install a Wallet program. At the same time, all transactions are executed directly and thus can not be blocked, etc. There are opportunities for the exchange of Bitcoins for national currencies, as well as for direct payment with them in stores.



The independence of Bitcoin excludes external influence on the operation of the network and is the basis of its key advantages over the banking system. The schedule of emission of new Bitcoins is algorithmically fixed for the next decades excluding uncontrolled inflation typical for fiat currencies. Absence of intermediaries means low commissions for transactions, and the continuous operation of network guarantees users an automatic transfer of any sums from any world point anywhere within 10 minutes without intermediaries, restrictions, and risks. Recently, it was hard even to imagine such a thing and now it became a real possibility for everyone who has Internet access.



But over time, restrictions and deficiencies are discovered even in the ingenious Bitcoin concept. It is normal, as it is impossible to create an ideal stable system on the first try. The developers have already removed many Bitcoin problems and some deficiencies were corrected via connection to a system of exterior elements and services (at the same time, it was necessary to slightly abandon principles of a decentralization and an independence underlying a success). But there still remain even such restrictions that are either difficult or are possible to overcome only through various "tricks" not correcting, but covering fundamental deficiencies of the system.



So low adaptiveness of Bitcoin architecture is the downside of its high reliability and stability, which applies the restrictions on the further development of a project. During the recent years, the Bitcoin network improved mainly only basic functionality, while the majority of new possibilities was added through the start of external centralized "add-ins". But today, despite all conceptual limitations, Bitcoin functions reliably, it is widely known and remains the most popular and demanded cryptocurrency.



Further information about Bitcoin is presented on https://bitcoin.org/




Evolution of cryptocurrency. Dash.



Some developers who are enthusiastic about Bitcoin success were not limited by the narrow framework of its architecture, but started alternative cryptocurrencies with changed parameters and the principles of operation. But soon it turned out that to win popularity is impossible only by "cosmetic" improvements of Bitcoin source code. It was necessary to offer users the significantly best solutions. From several hundreds of alternative projects, only few possess necessary features for long-term development and success in "great cryptocurrency evolution". The Dash/Darkcoin project which started in the beginning of 2014 is particularly noteworthy among them.



The Dash developers took Bitcoin code as the basis and are developing their "ideal cryptocurrency" – Digital Cash. First of all, a concept was advanced. For sustainable functioning and development of any cryptocurrency, a well-coordinated operation of many interconnected systems and processes is required: maintenance of network infrastructure, provision of computation power, financing of development, promotion of a project, etc. Effective self-regulation is necessary because the problems with any key process delay and put on threat all the project. The Bitcoin model is too simplified and envisages encouragement only of the participants of the network who provides the cryptographic protection (so-called "miners"). At the same time, the rest of Bitcoin components loses system support and operate arbitrarily. The advanced Dash concept includes decentralized mechanisms of encouragement and self-tuning of all important elements, which improves stability and project survivorship in general.



Further, the technology itself was advanced. The basis of all key benefits of Dash is a two-level architecture of its distributed network. Traditional single-level Bitcoin network is able to perform only the simplest slow operations: once in 10 minutes the consensus is reached and verified transactions are recorded to the allocated registry of operations. Two-level Dash network works in different way: the secure network nodes can reach consensus continuously, in real time. It allows to introduce speed protocols (without violating the principle of decentralization), that opens new possibilities unavailable for usual cryptocurrencies.



On the basis of this platform, such high-demand processes as Anonymization (exterior observers can not track transactions, balances, and a history of payments of users), the Fast transactions (complete confirmation of transfers in 5 seconds as bank cards), the Vote (decentralized development and project financing governance) are already implemented. In the future, possibilities of two-level Dash network can be used for introduction of such solutions as Distributed Storage Systems (lists of transactions, registries, messages, etc.), Distributed Application Systems (exchanges, stores, services, etc.), support of the Third-party projects, etc.



The further development of Dash will be determined by a voting system that is now being implemented. This unique tool for the world of cryptocurrencies will allow Dash to use all benefits of democracy, effectively using resources, knowledge, and experience of participants of a community. Anyone will be able to make proposals aimed at development, to justify budget and to receive target funding, if the community approves its initiative. The talents will be able to be self-actualized, receiving at the same time not only moral but also monetary satisfaction. Similarly to how communities with democratic principles inevitably anticipate dictatorships, Dash will be able to evolve more effectively than other cryptocurrencies, which limits their development.



Thus, instead of creation of the cryptocurrency with a limited set of some functions, Dash creates a platform adjusted to the maximum to the further effective development, adaptation, and promotion of any new cryptocurrency technologies.



Further information about Dash is presented on https://www.dashpay.io/



There are other interesting cryptocurrency projects proposing different sales of payment and auxiliary systems as well.



Conclusion


Search of more effective and less destructive forms of development directs a progressive part of humanity by the path of joining into a sole community in which the world of finance is an important element. But the existing financial system doesn't foster it, but pushes the world back to the barbaric past with constant wars and mechanisms of control, oppression, and enslavement of individuals, as well as all states. Evolution of money can turn the World from the tool of dictatorship into the means of achievement of financial freedom, independence and efficiency.



The innovative technologies that recently emerged allowed to create cryptocurrencies, alternative money which is able to become a global independent instrument limiting the power of the current financial elite. By virtue of the decentralized nature, cryptocurrencies do not need any permit and can work everywhere, but the issue of their big application is to a greater extent a social than a technical issue. The people should find out the emerged alternatives and dare to use them. Realization of alternatives is the first step towards liberation and extensive discussion helps this realization.



The more people learn of cryptocurrencies, earlier all improvements associated with them come into our life. If the touched topics did not leave you indifferent – share the link of this article with your environment.

By: Alex-ru
Source: Dashtalk.org